It’s time for a music quiz.
Are you salivating, Glo?
Here it goes:
1. In a 1973 hit by
Deep Purple, they are singing about “smoke” and “water”. What song?
What smoke? What water? What famous group of the time is mentioned in
the song?
2. Who won the 1971
World Series and what was their theme song?
Who performed it?
3. Who sang “Diamond
Girl”? Name the year within three years. (Extra credit if you hit it exactly)
Janice Joplin (1943-1970). She was
quite a "swill" singer!
4. What band did Rick
Derringer start with at age 17? What was
their huge hit of 1965 and who did they knock out of #1 on the Hit Parade with
it?
5. Who sang “Raindrops
Keep Falling on My Head” and in what movie was it featured? It became Billboard’s number 1 hit of what
year?
6. Name the 1975
disco hit by The Silver Convention.
7. Name Janice Joplin’s favorite booze.
8. Who was Carly
Simon singing about in her 1973 hit “You’re So Vain”?
9. What brand of car
is mentioned in a 1981 hit by Blondie that has been considered by many to be
the first successful rap song? Who is
the lead singer?
10. Name three hits
from the J. Geils Band.
Extra credit question:
Who the hell was Kay Kyser?”
This is NOT an open book test. Anyone caught cheating will have to wash the
blackboards after class and beat the chalk dust out of the erasers.
Good luck! I’ll give
you a reasonable amount of time to complete the quiz. While you’re working on it, I’ll be hanging
around the teacher’s lounge trying to find out more about the good looking babe
who is the new English teacher!
“The parallel between
Benghazi and the IRS story is amazing.
(It’s) lying about lying, then lying about the fact that they are
lying. Then seeking to apologize for
lies that they claim they didn’t tell.
This pattern is a culture of big government who believes that it is more
important than the American people.”
……….Newt Gingrich.
I doubt if Obama had any inkling of what 2013 might bring to
his table after his easy re-election in 2012.
He even started off the New Year with a bang by beating the Republicans
into an embarrassing cave in on tax hikes for the fiscal cliff.
Wow! How rosy it
looked for the guy who brings new meaning to “superego.” At his State of the Union speech, he proposed
a “left wing dream factory” according to columnist Charles Krauthammer with a
declaration of war on global warming (even though temperatures are the same as
16 years ago and CO2 emissions are at a 20 year low).
House Rep Jason Chaffetz is talking of
possible impeachment proceedings.
Also on the list was universal pre-school for 5 year olds in
a country already drowning in debt. He
also felt confident in the Democrats re-gaining the House in 2014.
Gosh, this being the President isn’t hard after all; except
that it is, especially when you are, as Edward Klein called Obama in his book, The Amateur.
When confronted by the lack of his intimidation on sequester
by Republicans, he panicked like a schoolyard brat with silliness like airline
delays and the cancellation of White House tours. Looking foolish, he eventually caved in.
Need we discuss his embarrassment over the loss of his gun
control bill? Sure, why not? I wonder how much gas he burned up at our
expense to fly all over hell posing with grieving relatives of those slain by
guns. He lost 60-40 in a Senate that had 55 seats belonging to his own party.
Want more? How about
the Benghazi hearings? The IRS/Tea Party scandal? The AP wire tapping by Obama’s buddy Holder
(“Who, me? Yes, you!”), and the
latest: HHS Secretary Sibelius trying to
illegally get funds to prop up Obamacare. Hell, as long as we are airing out this guy,
how about a SECOND court ruling against his illegal appointment of members to
the National Labor Relations Board while the Senate was off? It’s like endlessly listening to Sonny and
Cher sing “And the beat goes on.”
The Republicans have a great opportunity here if they just
don’t blow it. In the 1948 film The Treasure of the Sierra Madre,
Humphrey Bogart (as Fred C. Dobbs) and Tim Holt (as Curtin) have been stiffed
on
their wages by their boss McCormick as played by Barton Mac Lane.
When they see McCormick walking down the street dressed in a
nice new suit with a young senorita, Dobbs says “Let’s get him….and get him
HARD!”
That’s exactly what Republicans need to do. Get Obama and get him hard. I may add that they need to do it soon. These types of opportunities have a way of
disappearing if not quickly acted upon!
I was browsing through Drudge and Fox News this morning and
besides airing my disgust about how screwed up this country has gotten under
the power of Obama and his crooked cronies (Benghazi? IRS scandal with the Tea
Party? Gun control? Immigration? and more), I managed to notice a piece from Entertainment Weekly.com about eighteen TV shows that have been
cancelled.
Before I looked at the list I wondered if there would be
even one show that I have ever heard of, much less watched. All of these shows were on “over the air”
channels like ABC, CBS, ABC and since 99% of my viewing habits come from cable
broadcasts, the chances were between slim and none that I knew the programs.
TV has deteriorated badly over the years. It has basically become a place for the
younger crowd that enjoys programming a lot less sophisticated than we of a
more advanced age enjoy. The accent
today is on more sex and violence and, of course, the shows stretch profanity
as far as possible with plenty of double entendre attempts at humor. Personally, I always like to perform my sex
and violence at home and didn’t need any TV show to show me how it’s done!
Many thought TV had gone a bit over the edge in the early
1970s with All in the Family. By “over the edge” I’m referring to the outspoken
opinions of Carroll O’Connor as Archie Bunker and his ability to make the
audience laugh at him while they laughed at themselves for having such silly
sensitivities about the subject that may yet be the downfall of this country: political correctness.
Archie was right.
Whether there is a coincidence or not, many outstanding lawyers are
Jewish and many black guys are outstanding athletes. So what?
Today, anyone saying that would hear a loud gasp and a “You can’t say
that!” If Archie were still here, he
would tell you quickly why you can.
There were other great network shows in those days mainly
because cable was not a factor. My wife
and I had a Saturday night ritual in the early 1970s: We would grill a couple of nice steaks on the
patio of our home in beautiful Shawnee, Kansas; add a baked potato, salad, a
bottle of wine and turn on our 10 inch Magnavox color TV to watch All in the Family, Sandy Duncan, Mary Tyler
Moore (with the great Ted Knight as “Ted Baxter!”) and The Bob Newhart Show.
Afterwards, we would take a shower together (only because it
saved water! Ahem!) then head over to Kansas City, Missouri to do some
clubbing. Those were fun days.
By 1976 we had graduated to a 27” Magnavox floor model. One day, while watching the four channels
available, there was a knock on the door.
The devil had arrived in the form of the guy selling cable! How could I resist Beelzebub when he offered
a chance to see the Atlanta Braves baseball games and non commercial movies
even if the first one we watched was Burt Reynolds in W. W. and the Dixie Dance Kings!
As far as those eighteen shows getting the ax, I have heard
of two; both of which I have never watched.
They are The Office and 30 Rock.
Here is the entire list in case you care.
One of the great scenes from "Frasier" (.48) which ran on NBC from 1993-2004. Niles and Lilith in the sack! OMIGOD!
Music is fun and entertaining to most of us whether it is
from our own memories of pop tunes recorded during our lifetimes or before.
I love the old stuff because the tunes are so great and
supply us with a vision of their times and some of the
lyrics infuriate the
holier than thou liberals of today who don’t understand the era that produced
the songs.
Cole Porter (1891-1964)
A favorite is “Let’s Do it (Let’s fall in love)” written in
1928 by the prolific Cole Porter. The
irony in this song is in the opening chorus where it states that “Chinks do it, Japs do it,up in Lapland little Laps do
it...”
Porter wrote it for the show Paris which was his first Broadway success. With the politically correct world that
evolved, the lyrics were later changed to “Birds do it, bees do it”. I think that is a cop out; I think Porter was
just having fun with the first lyrics and meant nothing harmful with “Chinks do
it, Japs do it” but as we know, tastes change and skin gets thinner (The attached YouTube has the original
lyrics).
I’ve been a music freak forever and still carry a harmonica
around much to the disdain of some but, hey, that’s just me. I’ve been following pop music since I was 6
or 7 and have never tired of it although some of the stuff today makes me glad
I like what are now the oldies.
One favorite from the late 40’s was a regular on the hit
parade from WCKY in Cincinnati: Peggy
Lee and her then husband Dave Barbour doing “Manana”. Peggy was great with any tune.
As the 50s arrived 1955 produced guys like Pat Boone with
“Ain’t That a Shame” and Perez Prado with “Cherry Pink and Apple Blossom White”.
Bill Haley and his Comets snuck in that
year with “Rock Around the Clock” which was a portent of things to come.
And come it did in 1956 with some guy named “Elvis” hitting
it big with “Hound Dog” and “Love me Tender.”
Does anyone remember one hit wonder Jim Lowe with “Green Door”?
Can it really be 55 years since I got out of high school?
That would be 1958 when “At the Hop”, by Danny and the Juniors, “Get a Job” by
The Silhouettes, “Tequila” by The Champs, and “Yakety Yak” by The Coasters
ruled.
The 60s were nice. I
spent 4 years in the Air Force; plenty of time to learn things I would never
had learned by staying in Cincy. Also a
time to meet girls and dance and love in clubs from Texas and Missouri to
Germany only to come home in 1965 and find my true love a month later. Isn’t fate great? The young guys today don’t know what they
missed by not having to serve.
Meanwhile, tunes like “The Lion Sleeps Tonight”, “The Twist”,
“The Duke of Earl”, “Surf City”, “Sugar Shack”, All the great British invasion
songs including “Downtown” by Pet Clark; Monday, Monday”, “Crimson and Clover”, and many other great
tunes came along.
Even today, I still like to occasionally turn up the volume
all the way and break off the knob as I am doing while I write this paean to
pop music. So far while writing I have
played The Smithereens, Donnie Iris, “Puttin’ on the Ritz”, Norman Greenbaum,
West End Girls, Jefferson Starship, One
Night in Bangkok, Greg Kihn Band, and Yes.
So many songs; so little time!
For
a good look at Paris of the 1920’s see Woody Allen’s “Midnight in Paris”
(2011).
Songs used by politicians to support their campaigns have
been around for a long time.
In the Depression ravaged early 1930’s, Franklin Roosevelt
used a previously written song which easily conveyed his campaign hopes, “Happy
Days are here Again”. Who wouldn’t fall
for these lyrics when the country was down and out?
Happy days
are here again The skies above are clear again Let us sing a song of cheer again Happy days are here again.
One of the most effective tunes was used by Harry Truman when
he ran for president in the late 1940’s.
Appropriately, it was “I’m Just Wild about Harry” which was written in
1921 for a Broadway show hence, it didn’t have the stigma of being trumped up
just for Truman’s campaign. Harry was
behind in the polls against Dewey for much of the campaign but won anyway so
maybe the song really did make people wild about Harry.
Then there is pop music which helps liberal candidates more
than conservatives because it aims at the younger crowds who are more
vulnerable and always dissatisfied with the status quo. While the conservatives may rely primarily on
patriotic themes the liberals will usually tie into a popular group or person bent
on change with their definition of change including taking from the rich to
give to the poor. To them that is an
easy solution regardless of whether many of the poor are deserving to take from
those who have earned their way.
Bob Dylan, c. 1965
I was first eligible to vote in 1962 when most of the protest
folk songs were beginning their popularity.
There was no FM radio to speak of then so the AM airwaves were packed
with complaints about our government, war, etc. by acts like Peter Paul and
Mary, Bob Dylan, Judy Collins, and to a lesser extent The Kingston Trio and
Pete Seeger.
I’m sure they meant well but I don’t remember ever hearing of
them giving the profits from their million selling discs to the needy. Does anyone really think that Joan Baez and
Peter Paul and Mary would have made it big without the anti war liberal
rants? Many of the youth of that era
fell right into their hands while the rest of us rocked to the “Peppermint
Twist” and “Runaround Sue” as we voted Republican.
We were mostly military guys in an era of the mandatory draft
while the “anti” gang was college kids mostly straight out of high school who
thought they could solve the world’s problems after taking a course in politics
from some liberal college professor who never served a day.
It’s carried on to today as groups like Crosby, Stills, and
Nash are bald and aging but still are fighting the establishment. Starting in the late 1970’s the punk rock
movement joined the crowd espousing left wing and anti-establishment
philosophies. Most of these bands look
like their members are twelve years old and just want to be “in” on
something. By the time they are thirty
and driving a Honda they will probably wonder what the hell they were thinking
all those years ago.
A member of The New Christy Minstrels (Barry McGuire) had a big anti war hit in September of 1965. I especially remember it because that’s the month I got out of the USAF and met my future wife.
Interesting note on Bob Dylan: In 1965 he changed to an electric guitar which infuriated most of his fans. Did he change because by then the protest era was fading and he felt he needed to move on or were his fans being unrealistic in their expectations of him?I think it was the former. The coffee house mentality was waning and fans wanted to hear more stuff on the cutting edge. Plus, the British Invasion was arriving and Bob had to eat like everyone else. To make matters worse disco was just around the corner. Sometimes a guy has to swallow his pride. Anyone remember "Lay Lady Lay"?
I doubt if there is anyone reading this who has not heard of
Alfred Hitchcock. Later this month on April 29, 2013 it
will be thirty-three years since the master of movie and television suspense
died at age 80.
Hitchcock was born in London, England in 1899 and by 1920
had developed an interest in the film business through his skill as an
accomplished artist. During the 1920s he
met his future wife and collaborator Alma Reville. They were married in 1927 and became the
parents of daughter Pat who was born in July of 1928.
The year 1927 was a big one for Hitchcock as he not only got
married but he directed his first film, The
Lodger.
In the UK throughout the 1930’s until 1939, Hitch churned
out many films with the best ones, in my opinion, being the original The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934) with
Peter Lorre, The 39 Steps (1935), and a personal favorite, The Lady Vanishes (1938).
After Jamaica Inn in 1939, he
moved to America where he would gain his biggest fame.
His first film after arriving in the U. S. was Rebecca which won the Oscar for best
picture of 1940. He went on to do such
favorites over the years as Strangers on
a Train (1951), Rear Window,
(1954), Vertigo (1958), Psycho (1960), and The Birds (1963). His 67
directorial credits also include his half hour TV show which ran from
1955-1961, Alfred Hitchcock Presents.
That Sunday night show produced many
memorable programs. He also did The Alfred Hitchcock Hour in 1962.
The above gives you a quick resume of Alfred Hitchcock’s
life and major accomplishments in the UK and America but what kind of a guy was
he and why were most of his works successful?
As a follower of vintage film productions, I was rarely bored
with a Hitchcock film. That’s not to say
I liked them all. I never could get into
Torn Curtain (1966) even though I was
drawn to see it because of the Hitchcock touch and that it starred Paul Newman
and Julie Andrews. Another clunker to me
was probably one of his most successful films, The Birds (1963).
The fun things about Hitchcock’s films were his ability to
create suspense and a feeling of anxiety that kept the viewers on the edge of
their seats through various twists and turns.
He liked icy female characters, preferably blondes, to inhabit his films
(Eva Marie Saint, Kim Novak, Tippi Hedren, Priscilla Lane, Janet Leigh,
etc.). He also liked the excitement of
someone being on the run like Cary Grant in North
by Northwest (1959), Robert Cummings in Saboteur
(1942), or Robert Donat in The 39
Steps (1935), etc.
He also always had a plot device that made the whole thing
work referred to as the “Macguffin.”
Combined with the music scores of Bernard Herrmann for many of the
films, it made for an enjoyable couple hours.
Hitchcock also liked to tease his audiences with his cameo appearances. Here is all of them. Some I remember, some I don't. I think the best is the one with his picture in the newspaper in Lifeboat (1944) advertising a weight reduction product. Watch carefully for it.
I wish we had more Alfred Hitchcocks in Hollywood today.
(For more on Hitchcock, Psycho,
and Phoenix, click here. For a complete
list of his movies, click here.)
Odds and ends…..This
morning’s Real Clear Politics poll shows Obama’s approval at 47.8% and
disapproval of 47.1%. That’s a 0.7
difference in his favor; not very good but why should it be?.....Here is a
great idea that never made it to reality probably because no one has to
parallel park anymore.
I remember having
to parallel park for my driver’s test when I was 16 and I always took pride in
being good at it. A co-worker once told
me they thought I could parallel park in a space smaller than a car. It’s a lost art just like shifting the gears
of “three on a tree.”
Does anyone remember
one speed vacuum windshield wipers that stopped when you hit the gas? How about the high beam headlight button on
the floor or the old Chevys with the vacuum stick shift? Anyone ever fixed a flat in an old time tube
tire? Do I dare mention two piece
windshields?......In a recent column on the AZ
Republic’s Politics blog I mentioned
how I don’t think a mayor is needed in the council-manager form of city
government and I cited Phoenix mayor Greg Stanton as a good example. He keeps reinforcing what I said about him a
few weeks ago: He is just a glorified ribbon
cutter for new supermarkets. The city manager runs the show while Stanton lies during
his campaign about removing the tax on food in Phoenix. That’s right; a tax on FOOD during hard times! Robert Robb said it all in a recent column in
the Republic where he mentioned there
were ways such as cutting out big raises to city employees which could have canceled
the food tax. However, Stanton seems
more interested in endorsing a silly buyback of guns which is nothing but a
political stunt.
Charles Barkley; he is never at a loss
for words.
Speaking of gun buybacks,
it’s a drop in the bucket but Obama has to love it as it will be fewer guns for
the feds to pick up when Obama decides to make all of us turn in our guns. Politicians like Stanton and others are like
followers of the Pied Piper that are being led into the river……I love the
candid attitude of Charles Barkley and he showed it this week on a broadcast
during the NCAA Basketball Tournament.
Doug Gottlieb, an
ex-player and a white guy, was on a panel including Barkley and three other black
guys when Gottlieb joked that he was there “to bring diversity to the set; kind
of the white man’s perspective.” Wow! The
liberal Twitter freaks went crazy blasting Gottlieb for his joking
statement. Barkley had the best reply of
anyone to those no-life, over sensitive losers: "I want to say something about Doug Gottlieb,”
Barkley said. “He made a joke earlier tonight and people are going crazy. All
those idiots on Twitter, which I would never ever do, all you people at home
who have got no life and are talking bad about Doug Gottlieb, get a life. It’s
over with. It’s no big deal.”
Go Charles!You can always count
on Barkley to express his feelings and he is right on this one.
Welcome to America: I just read about a local guy who said that
he recently applied for employment at a large home improvement chain. I assume it has to be Lowe’s or Home Depot.
The guy has 25 years experience in the construction business
and has dealt with the public the entire time.
Needless to say, he probably got the job, right? Wrong, Kemo Sabe.
During the interview, he was asked if he was bi-lingual
since the store was looking for someone to deal with foreign speaking
customers. Being an American, his answer
was “No”. He didn’t get the job or two
others at similar companies.
What is the mystique that foreign countries seem to have
over us these days? It used to be that
those who came here had to learn OUR language, not the other way around. No wonder Rosetta Stone runs so many TV commercials!
I’ve always like
Senator Rob Portman of Ohio as a good conservative Republican. However, with his 21 year old son’s recent admission
that he is gay, Portman has suddenly gone into reverse and now supports gays.
It’s a head scratcher for sure but I have to agree with the
following opinion from the “Daily Caller”:
But if the sole reason for Portman’s
switch is that he discovered he has a gay son, well that makes me wonder how
deeply he thought through the issue to begin with, because, honestly, it
shouldn’t matter. He could love his son and still oppose gay marriage. Or
he could be childless and still support it. His familial circumstances ought to
be irrelevant. Has he not heard of thought exercises like the “veil of
ignorance” or the “moral spectator”? Progressives aren’t the only ones who
should be skeptical of Portman’s reversal. This makes me wonder about his
commitment to other issues. What if another family member had an unplanned
pregnancy? Would he then change his position on abortion and the right to life?
The latest Real Clear Politics poll shows that Obama’s approval rating is
now only +0.6 above his disapproval rating.
A couple months ago he was at +10.1; that’s quite a drop to be sure.
This means it’s about 50-50. I can’t say
he hasn’t earned it.
Jennifer Capriati is in trouble again
Most of us remember the much heralded teen tennis star from
the 90s, Jennifer Capriati. She was
winning matches against highly ranked players at age 13 and seemed destined for
immortality in tennis. Unfortunately,
she took a wrong turn along the way and has gotten in a few scrapes involving
drugs plus other problems.
I remember
when she was at her peak and even then she seemed to have an attitude unlike
the bubbly and popular 1990s teen player Monica Seles. Capriati had a drug bust a couple years later
along with shoplifting charges and recently at age 36 is in more trouble on stalking
and battery charges against her ex-boyfriend.
I guess The
Beatles were right: Money can’t buy you
love.
Honors Night cancelled. More liberal nonsense from a high school
principal in Massachusetts who called off an Honors Night saying it could
be “devastating to the students who worked hard, but fell short of the grades.”
What a clueless jerk! I have news for him: Some kids are smarter or work harder than
others and they deserve the recognition for their efforts. He is applying the typical liberal mentality
that everyone is equal and it’s important that no one’s feelings are hurt. I feel sorry for his students when they
arrive in the real world where having your poor feelings hurt can be a daily
experience.
Are you sick of all the liberal entertainment business
phonies who follow Obama around like little puppies following their
master? Fortunately, not all of them are
members of that category.
Let’s take a look at some conservative entertainers who have
the brains to not fall for the Obama mystique as so many others have:
Rapper 50 Cent: Yes, there is a Black rapper who is
conservative. He has even said: “I actually like Bush. In some ways I am the George W. Bush of hip
hop. Nobody likes me but I’m still gonna
run it for the next four years.”
Other entertainers who support conservatism: Adam Sandler, Phoenix native Alice Cooper, Bo
Derek of “10” fame, the smiling coach of
the New England Patriots, Bill Belichick, tennis great Chris Evert, FOX News
regular Dennis Miller, and many others.
We bought our first
television in 1950. It was a 16”
black and white “National” floor model and even with the antenna strapped to
our chimney; the reception wasn’t very good; especially when planes flew
overhead or when it was stormy.
Mel Blanc, (c.1959)
None of those inconveniences bothered us as we had TV even
if it did broadcast only from 5:00 p.m. until midnight. It seemed so incomprehensible at the time
that we could hear a show AND see it at the same time. It was quite an entertainment center and it hastened
the end of network radio by September 30, 1962 when the last radio network show,
“Yours Truly, Johnny Dollar” signed off for the last time.
I enjoy great quotes and radio and television sure supplied
many of them over the years. Mel Blanc
(1908-1989) was the voice of Bugs Bunny and many other cartoon characters
besides being a regular on the Jack Benny radio show which was great listening in
the 1940s and 50s.
Mel was also known as the Los Angeles train station
announcer on Benny’s show when he would call the boarding of the "Train
leaving on Track 5 for Anaheim, Azusa and Cuuuu-ca-mon-gaaa!" I don’t know of anyone who ever got tired of
that bit in the 15 years Blanc did it from 1950-1965.
In the fall of 1970 “The Mary Tyler Moore” debuted on CBS
starring Mary and Ed Asner as Lou Grant, her crusty boss in the newsroom of WJM-TV in
Minneapolis.
Mary played an ambitious newcomer. Noticing that, cantankerous Lou says, “Mary! You’ve got spunk!” Taking that as a compliment, Mary says, “Really? Thanks Mr. Grant.” Lou quickly replies, “I hate spunk!”
Other great ones include one of my favorites said by Jackie
Gleason as Ralph Kramden to Audrey Meadows on “The Honeymooners”: “Baby, you’re the greatest!”
How about Dan Ackroyd’s line to Jane Curtin in the early days
of “Saturday Night Live”: “Jane, you ignorant slut!” or Fred Sanford (Redd Foxx) on “Sanford and Son” as he grasps
his chest “Elizabeth! I’m comin’!"
Who could forget William Sanderson’s line from “Newhart” (1982-1990)
as he introduced himself and his brothers: “I’m Larry; this is my brother Darryl
and my other brother Darryl.”
The other day, I read an article lamenting the end of ten TV
shows that have had long runs in recent years.
Television has gotten so bad lately that I didn’t know any of those
shows. I much prefer Turner Classic Movies and vintage TV.
I had to post this Benson cartoon from March 3rd since it
isn’t often he draws anything that would be the least bit injurious to his
liberal following.
This cartoon shows Obama’s lack of understanding the
American public. It’s a takeoff on the children’s
Story Teller’s Book written in 1912 by
Alice O’Grady.
It’s called “Chicken Licken” and I’m sure most of you have
heard the story, especially in your youth.
Chicken Licken has a pea fall from a vine hitting her on the
tail and immediately thinks that the sky is falling and that she must immediately
go tell the king.
As she runs off she encounters her friends Henny Penny, Ducky
Lucky, Cocky Locky, and Turkey Lurkey who join in the mad scramble to tell the
king that the sky is falling.
When they reach the woods, they meet Foxy Loxy and tell him
they need directions to the king. He
says he knows the way as he smiles and lures them into his cavern. He later emerges from the cavern but those
foolish birds were never heard from again.
Fortunately for the guy in Benson’s cartoon who represents
the enlightened public, he is ignoring the ever present warnings from Chicken Licken
Obama about the sky falling. After all,
how many times must we hear his broken record pronouncements of another crisis if
we don’t follow his rules? Now we shrug and yawn and go back to sleep in the comfort
of our hammocks.
The latest Gallup Poll shows Obama’s approval rating at 47%;
pretty poor considering his recent election.
Real Clear Politics shows his approval rating down to 5.9% after
recently being almost 9. The stock
market doesn’t seem too frightened either.
First, it was the “fiscal cliff” early this year when the Republicans
unfortunately caved and gave Obama his tax increase on the wealthy; an increase
that wasn’t a heavy revenue producer but allowed him to feed his ego by claiming
a win over a group he detests.
Then came the 2% increase to paychecks; an increase that
many weren’t prepared for or happy about. With the sequester,
he wanted ANOTHER tax increase on those dreaded rich people. The Republicans said “No!” so now the threats
begin with the release of illegal immigrants for starters and who knows what
other imagined catastrophe he will dream up next to try and fool the public.
Some may
think that now that the sequester is in effect, that is the end of it. Not so mes amis! On March 27, the
current continuing resolution that funds the government’s operations ends.
Either a new resolution must be approved by the House and Senate, or a broader
budget must be approved. If Congress
can’t reach a budget deal by March 27, all nonessential federal government
operations stop.
So when does this stop? I’ve been breathing since a year after
FDR won his fourth term in 1940 and I have never seen such a maelstrom of nonsense
in the federal government. Are we
actually paying this guy money to screw up this country? (Here is a good takeoff on the sequester from SNL, (4:25) courtesy of Middy)
One of my favorite bloggers is Glo. She has been around almost as long as this
blog has. She and CJ were the first
female bloggers I had after the AZ Central blogs launched on December 6, 2006. I think their first entries appeared about a
month or two later in early 2007. They
have both followed me to this blog which I did as a secondary item until AZ
Central got ruined in 2011 with the arrival of the Facebook requirement for
comments.
In a way, Facebook was a blessing. Before it was required, I would get 50 or 60 comments on a blog story.
One of my favorites was something I did on how soda pop was referred to
in different parts of the country. I
called it “Soda, Pop, or Coke” and never thought that something so mundane
would get many hits. It wound up with 74
comments by 44 readers; some of them from far away. When I re-printed it in February of 2009 on
my Google blog, it drew another 36 comments.
It just goes to show that one never knows what will work when doing a
piece.
A large percentage of my AZ Central blogs still exist in my
Google blog archives and I enjoy checking them out now and then for nostalgic
reasons if nothing else. AZ Central was
a good thing that eventually scared the Arizona
Republic when some of the comments became a bit overwrought over their
political preferences. I didn’t do that
much in the way of politics so I got swept aside when the
Facebook nonsense became effective and I refused to be a part of it.
In the first paragraph, I mentioned Glo and Cj but I mustn’t
forget others like Middy, Mike, Proud, Sam, native, Allen, Ken, AHG, Lynda,
John W., Doc John, Larry, DG, Steve, Kevin, Lynda, rettajim, stealth, blue,
Niagara Dave, and the irrepressible Rick.
There are others I may not have named but do appreciate.
Speaking of Glo and Middy, I have found in my Shorpy
archives a couple of vintage photos that apply to the part of the country where
they lived before becoming dues paying members of Arizona.
This is a photo of some ladies enjoying a night of bowling
in Glo’s home state of Connecticut in 1942.
They are playing the eastern game of duck pin bowling hence, the smaller
balls. The lanes they are using are
located in the basement of the fire station in Bantam, Connecticut. Could the lady throwing the ball possibly be
Glo’s mom?
Since Middy grew up in the panhandle of Texas, I thought a
good old fashioned dust storm photo would bring back memories of those
years. The photo was taken in Amarillo,
Texas in 1936 during one of the dust storms.
Residents of that area have said that a windsock to them was a “brick
welded to a chain.”
That sounds about right.
I had the honor of being stationed in Amarillo for a couple months in
1961 and some of the wind I experienced probably wouldn’t move the brick!
Professional golfer and ASU grad Phil Mickelson has recently
spoken about his combined tax hit from the federal government and the State of California
going into the 60% to 63% range.
Understandably, Phil is unhappy about such a situation and is
considering leaving the golden state.
Mickelson has always come across as one of the really
good guys in sports. He is mannerly, a
good family man, and a fan favorite who has had his share of heartaches over
his wife’s and mother’s battles with breast cancer. Through it all, he has smiled, never brushed
off autograph seekers, given balls to and gloves to kids, and helped charities.
Phil shows his trophy received for winning the
2000 Buick Invitational
As expected, the day after Phil declared his unhappiness
with the tax situation, the $1.98 an hour liberals started coming out of the
woodwork calling his statements “controversial” and criticizing him as being a
greedy athlete. Being the guy he is, he
actually apologized unnecessarily for his comments about moving from tax heavy
California.
On another blog I do (AZC Voices, Politics) one of the fiery female
liberal loudmouth contributors took issue with Phil trying to point out that
with all the money he makes, he should be glad to pay the higher taxes and that
even after paying up would still have more than most people. It’s as if she is the one who should decide
how much money Mickelson should make and how much he deserves to keep. One of the favorite statements from liberals
is: “Gosh, how much do you need?” My answer is “None of your damned business”.
This is the classic liberal mentality that we have to put up
with today. They believe that taking
more than half of someone’s income is only right because it is their supposed “fair
share”. Of course, with the above
mentioned female blogger who derogatorily referred to Mr. Mickelson as “dear
sweet Phil”, she loves looking at successful people as needing to pay more
taxes to prop up the almost 50% who don’t pay any taxes. Maybe if she tried to play golf, she would
realize what an impossible game it is and give guys like Mickelson the respect they deserve.
Actually, she wouldn’t because that is not the way liberals
think. They don’t want a wealthy class;
they want everyone equal with the rich doing the heavy lifting and giving more
to those beneath them. That’s the type
of mentality that saps initiative away from the makers of the world and why we
have a liberal president who wants job killing items like a $9 per hour minimum
wage while squandering millions to losers like Solyndra and Tesla.
The good news is that his approval ratings have slipped in a
couple of important polls. Maybe America
is finally seeing the light.
Meanwhile, Phil Mickelson is doing well this weekend in the
Northern Trust Open in Los Angeles. I
would love to see him win it and pocket another million bucks.
Remember when someone would be considered “fat” if they were
short and weighed 400 pounds? How about
someone who refused to work and sponged off others being called a “bum.” Let’s not forget the guy who would pick up
your trash as the “garbage man” and guys like George Washington, Jefferson, Adams,
etc. being known as the “Founding Fathers.”
Forget all that as we are now in the idiotic world of
political correctness and are not supposed to use those terms. I say “we” are in that world but in reality I
am not a member of the political correctness society and I’m sure many of you
aren’t either.
Today, in our liberal society that dreads the remotest
possibility that someone may have their feelings hurt, that 400 pound guy would
be referred to as having “an enlarged physical condition caused by a completely
natural genetically induced hormone imbalance.”
To those of us who are from the old school he still is “fat”. The “bum” is now a “homeless person” and the “Founding
Fathers” are “The Founders”. We can’t
risk offending women of the 18th century who might have pitched in! As for the “garbage man” he is now a “sanitation
engineer.”
I wonder where this "sanitation engineer" from the 1950s received his degree. Yale? Harvard?
It’s all nonsense brought about by a clueless group of today
that has no sense of reality. I remember
a few years ago when Tiger Woods hit a bad shot, the microphone picked up his
voice muttering “I hit that like a retard!”
He caught hell over that even though not too many years’ earlier “retard”
or “retarded” were common terms for someone with a mental disability. Another no-no was from Barack himself when he
proved on the bowling lanes that he has no athletic ability whatsoever and
exclaimed that he looked like he was a member of the Special Olympics.
Philip Atkinson, author of A Study of Our Decline, says it best: "Political Correctness
is merely the resentment of spoiled children directed against their parent’s
values."
It’s not just political correctness that
is annoying today. How about some of the
popular expressions we have to hear continuously. What better place to start on those than from
Barack himself. This guy is more
repetitive than a Thompson machine gun but far less effective. How many times have we heard him say “…but I won” and “It’s a problem
that I inherited.” My favorites are “Make no
mistake.” “Change isn't easy.” “Let me be clear.”
Remember a few years ago when there wasn’t a teen age girl in
captivity that didn’t utter “Whatever!”
at least a hundred times a day? It’s
still around but like “awesome” and “dude”, is not as popular as it once
was.
Our buddy Barack gets to take credit again for the term “fair share” as in “I want to raise
taxes on the rich so they pay their “fair share” to support the bums on
welfare.”
Then there is “not a
problem” (what happened to O.K.?), home
invasion (it sounds less crude than “break in”), “my bad” (sounds stupid even from a kid), “hone in” (are people so dumb they don’t know its “home in”) and
many others of which I’m sure you are familiar.
Psychiatrist Dr. Keith Ablow says that we are raising a
generation of deluded narcissists: “A new analysis of the American
Freshman Survey, which has accumulated data for the past 47 years from 9
million young adults, reveals that college students are more likely than ever
to call themselves gifted and driven to succeed, even though their test scores
and time spent studying are decreasing.”
Dr. Ablow sees a tendency toward narcissism that has
developed over the past thirty years. He
sees a “toxic psychological impact of media and technology on children,
adolescents and young adults, particularly as it regards turning them into faux
celebrities—the equivalent of lead actors in their own fictionalized life
stories.”
Where does all this narcissism originate? Dr. Ablow cites Facebook, Twitter, computer
games, and MTV as four sources.
On Facebook, one can claim hundreds of “friends” while
feeling they are actually connected to celebrities that they “like.”
With Twitter, the ego is aroused by the feeling that they
actually have a “following” that cares what they do even if they have to
explain it in 140 characters.
When playing computer games one “can pretend they are
Olympians, Formula 1 drivers, rock stars or sharpshooters while “ they are
really in dens and playrooms on side streets around America; that is after
their hearts have raced and heads have swelled with false pride for being
something they are not.”
I have a neighbor who is 60 years old. She knows that I used to be a 200+ average
bowler so one day she excitedly told me how her daughter in law had bowled a
298 game. Needless to say I was
impressed! A 298 is only two pins away
from a perfect 300. When I asked what
kind of ball she threw, I was informed that the score had been accomplished on
a video game!
I didn’t know whether to laugh or shake my head in disgust so
I just smiled and told her “good game.”
It was just another example of how people want fame the easy way. It’s kind of like phony awards being given to
losing teams and individuals in the never ending quest for someone to try and
get their 15 minutes of fame although by false methods.
The original "veejays" on MTV in 1981. L-R, Nina
Blackwood, Alan Hunter, Martha Quinn, J. J. Jackson,
(back) Mark Goodman
MTV shows kids on “reality” TV shows like "Jersey Shore" that are
not even close to real life but kids suck it up and portray themselves in the
same manner as people like Snooki and her friends.
Does anyone remember when MTV came on the air in 1981 with “veejays”
Martha Quinn, J. J. Jackson, and Mark Goodman?
Do you remember the first song they played? (Click here for answer) It was a great music network then. Now, they do “Jersey Shore.”
I have said it before and will repeat it now: I think a lot of the false ego trips and
artificiality of younger people today, especially males, is that they never had
to serve in the military. Dropping the
draft in 1973 was a huge mistake. The
military turned a lot of boys into men; much more than the young lifestyles of
today where "responsibility" is just another word they can’t spell.
Middy was kind enough yesterday to post the clip of Michelle
Obama wearing her new Walmart inspired 1968 Diana Ross wig while she stuffed
her face at the inauguration. In case you missed it, click here.
She reminded me of some of the guys I knew in the Air Force
who would eat like it was going out of style.
Meanwhile, she thinks school kids should starve on her idiotic diet. When I say “school kids”, I am omitting her
kids who eat hearty meals at their private school.
We now find out that Beyonce faked the National Anthem with lip
synchronization. That’s pretty gutless;
I guess she hasn't the voice she thought she had. Yes, Beyonce, you would have no career
without electronic assistance.
My wife Barb taught elementary school for 22 years and draws
an interesting analogy of how liberals might like to apply their philosophy to
student grades. Obama would probably
applaud this method using his tired statement of how “It’s only fair” just like
“it’s only fair that the rich pay a little more.”
The liberal grading system:
Child number one studies his butt off to get an “A”. Child number two does nothing and gets an “F”. Fear not, child number two! We will take half of child number one’s “A”
and give you a “C” so you can pass. The
other half of child number one’s “A” also becomes a “C” which he retains so he
can also pass.
That's OK kid, have a nice nap, the good students will cover for you. Maybe!
What is the lesson learned?
The “A” student now realizes that no matter how many “A’s” he gets, he
will lose half his grade to the loser kids who do nothing. He now figures, “Hell, if I get an “A” I will
only lose half of it to that kid sleeping at the desk next to me. Like him, I’m going to do nothing and take my guaranteed “C”.
The “F” student loves this system. He can sleep in class every day and still pass
with a “C”. Even if he decides to better
himself by studying hard and getting an “A”, he knows he will only lose half of
it to some other loser like himself so why bother?
The above is a good example of what Obama would love to have
you think “is only fair.” To him
fairness is for someone to take risks, work long hours, become successful, and then
give a large amount of what they earned to those without the same
ambition. It’s a wonder that anyone has
initiative anymore.
In case you are someone who has initiative and is feverishly
looking for a job in the still bad economy, I would advise you to take your
resume very seriously. If ever the term “watch
your p’s and q’s” was in effect it is on a resume. Bad grammar can get you tossed in the trash
in a hurry.
With the number of resumes flooding employers, they have to
be narrowed down somehow and grammatical errors are one way to do that
according to CareerBuilder.
Checklist: Know your
homophones! Those are words that are
spelled differently but sound the same.
Too, to, and two are good examples.
I see a lot of writing where people don’t know what to do with “too.”
Keep tenses correct, proofread, and proofread again. This is something I always do with the blogs. If you find a mistake, it isn't because I'm not TRYING to get it right.
(Click here to read my latest blog on the AZC Politics blog from the Republic. Thanks!)
The following story illustrates the importance of gun
ownership and the need to have your weapon ready if the situation warrants
it. It’s too bad that being armed has
become a necessity but that is the lifestyle we now face in the United States
of America.
The headlines in the “Valley and State” section of the Arizona Republic shouted yesterday
(January 14) that “17 YEAR OLD FATALLY SHOT IN FIGHT”.
The story goes as follows:
The 17 year old was shot to death at about 11:15 p. m. Saturday outside
an apartment complex at 17th Street and Indian School Road.
Responding officers found that the 17 year olds’ two 18 year
old brothers were throwing large river rocks into an apartment occupied by a 19
year old guy, his girlfriend, and child.
One of the rocks had hit the 19 year old requiring medical attention.
Investigators determined that the 17 year old and his two
brothers had been drinking and gotten into an argument with the 19 year
old. The 19 year old walked away and
went into his apartment and shut the door. At that time the 17 year old went
into his apartment and retrieved two knives.
When he returned with the knives, he and his brothers tried
to force their way into the 19 year olds’ apartment while hollering threats.
The 19 year old repeatedly told them to leave and that he
had a gun. Fearing for his life and the
lives of his girlfriend and baby, he shot the 17 year old dead. The brothers retreated and began throwing the
river rocks through the apartment window.
When push comes
to shove........
When the police arrived, they arrested the two
brothers. The 19 year old guy was
released on a self defense claim.
I wonder how many times a day this situation is re-enacted
in the United States. I wonder how many
times the person being attacked doesn’t have a gun and winds up on the
unfortunate end of the stick.
In this case, the guy had a gun and protected his family
while the bad guy suffered death. It
seems only appropriate that it should be that way yet there are those who think
all our guns should be taken away.
I never thought that I would have to carry a gun with me but
I now go nowhere without it. I like the
above story in the sense that three guys were breaking into an apartment with a
guy, his girl, and their baby and they were thwarted by firepower.
Maybe a few crooks will hear about it and think twice before
attacking someone.
(I also write a weekly blog at http://azcvoices.com/politics/author/jimmcallister/. Check it out!)
It seems like the good old USA we used to know is coming apart at the seams.
We now have a president whose ego is bigger than all outdoors and suddenly people are coming out of the woodwork with guns ambushing kids in classrooms.
The president wants higher taxes to feed his welfare state as we have now gone through two or three generations of people who have never considered working any harder than to lift a free check.
The free enterprise system that made this country successful is being taxed more so a spend happy federal government can become a bigger yet unneeded and unwanted device to fleece the makers in favor of the takers under the guise of "I think it is better when the wealth is spread around." Surprisingly, many have been gullible enough to believe such nonsense.
They are getting a course in reality lately though as there is quite a bit of ire concerning the rise in social security taxes. Suddenly, losing about $70 per paycheck is not so pleasant. Did they actually think that spreading the wealth around would not include contributions from them? (More on my blog at "azcvoices")
Let's take a moment and look back to a time when things made a bit more sense. I'm not talking Huckleberry Finn times but more like things were when many of us were younger.
Can you identify the items from the past in the following photos? Good luck!
I watched a great film last night; one that I have seen many
times but I never tire of it. It was
“The Asphalt Jungle” from 1950 and starred many popular stars from that era
like Sam Jaffe, James Whitmore, Sterling Hayden, Louis Calhern, and in a small
part, a beautiful 24 year old unknown blond named Marilyn Monroe.
Two long ago policemen stand by their 1949 Ford
I love classic films like “The Asphalt Jungle” not only for
the better actors in general and the character actors in particular, but for
the miscellaneous pieces of the past that I remember well as a kid and their
value as examples of film noir art. For
example, the opening scene shows a 1949 Ford police car cruising the waterfront
of a large unnamed Midwestern city. I
was a real car buff in that era of my young life and loved 1949-50 Fords for
their sleek styling and design over the boxier 1948 and previous Fords of that
era.
The Republicans have lost again to Obama but I don’t think
they had much choice if they wanted to retain even a shred of viability for the
future. By allowing the cliff they have
survived to fight another day while allowing it would have finished them in
2014. It probably will anyway as giving
up $660 billion in revenue for $62 billion in cuts doesn’t make much sense.
Three pieces of good news though: 1. Many of the ones who supported this
nonsense are going to see higher taxes anyway and jobs lost. 2. The public reaction in general contains a
lot of anger toward Obama according to comments this morning in various news
stories. 3. The best story is about last
Friday when John Boehner told Harry Reid to “Go f-ck yourself!” not once but
twice.
He will probably get overruled but a U. S. District Judge
has ruled in favor of Domino’s Pizza tycoon Tom Monaghan who has protested
having to cover the mandatory morning after pill part of Obamacare because of his
religious beliefs.
Hobby Lobby has also sued for the same reasons. If nothing else, these cases may arouse some
public awareness. It amazes me that any
government in the USA would make employers pay for a morning after pill but
that is the mentality we now live under.
Syndicated writer Kathleen Parker wrote a piece this morning
that echoes and updates what I wrote in 2008 about the demise of hard copy
newspapers. When I wrote my piece in
2008, Twitter, Smartphones, and texting were in their infancy. The biggest fear of the hard copy papers was
readers going to their desk top computers to read the paper.
Now, there are so many other sources for news that many
papers like the Arizona Republic have
resorted to paid subscriptions to their online editions. We’ll see how that goes at $10 a month cost. I bought in but barely use it since I am
stubborn and like the hard copy.
I think there is still a certain romance to waddling out to
the driveway to get the paper in the morning then snapping it open next to a
cup of Joe to see the headlines.
There is also a lot more excitement with the hard copy if
you have a column printed in it. Knowing
that about 300,000 people all over Phoenix have a copy of something you wrote
is exciting stuff; a lot more exciting than seeing it on a computer screen and
wondering how many see it.
I hope the Smartphone people are not holding their breath
waiting for me to buy one. Ain’t gonna
happen!
Saturday, December 29, 2012
Happy New Year.........2013 Thanks for making 2012 a great blogging year. See you after January 1. JIM